Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2012

Another Successful Veil Piercing Against Non-U.S. National For U.S. Judgment

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

We have posted recently on the New York law on piercing the corporate veil, since New York law continues to be the central law one sees in international litigations in the U.S., and veil piercing could be expected to be a particularly challenging and important issue in connection with non-U.S. nationals or entities.

United StatesInternational Law

We have posted recently on the New York law on piercing the corporate veil, since New York law continues to be the central law one sees in international litigations in the U.S., and veil piercing could be expected to be a particularly challenging and important issue in connection with non-U.S. nationals or entities. See for example, our discussion of false conflicts in the context of a veil piercing proceeding, and our treatment of whether veil piercing was the correct procedure to enforce an arbitral award (it was, but the claim lost on the merits).

In another ruling, the Southern District of New York decided the case styled Ridge Clearing & Outsourcing Solutions, Inc. v. Khashoggi, 07 Civ. 6611(RJH)(S.D.N.Y. 2011), the Court articulated and applied New York's veil piercing against Adnan Khashoggi, a national of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in the context of claims for stock purchase and delivery transactions gone awry. The decision is post-trial; the plaintiffs

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from