Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MAY 2016

ITC ALJ Potentially Weakens R&D-Based Domestic Industry

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On April 26, 2016, ITC Administrative Law Judge Lord issued the public version of her final initial determination in Certain Electric Skin Care Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefor, and Kits Containing Same.

United StatesIntellectual Property

On April 26, 2016, International Trade Commission ("ITC") Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") Lord issued the public version of her final initial determination ("ID") in Certain Electric Skin Care Devices, Brushes and Chargers Therefor, and Kits Containing Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-959 ("Certain Electric Skin Care Devices"). While the ALJ found that a domestic industry exists, she determined that expenditures relating to research and development cannot be counted toward satisfaction of subsections (A) or (B) of the domestic industry requirement—a holding that could potentially weaken trade protections for U.S. industry.

Statutory Framework

The ITC has jurisdiction over cases involving "industr[ies] in the United States, relating to the articles protected by the patent, copyright, trademark, mask work, or design concerned, exists or is in the process of being established." 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(2). This requirement is met only if there is: (i) significant investment in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from