Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2024

Imprecise Claim Charts And Improper Incorporation By Reference Result In Institution Denial

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

On March 23, 2024, Nearmap US, Inc. ("Nearmap") filed a petition for inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 10,671,648 ("the '648 Patent") ("IPR716")...

United StatesIntellectual Property

On March 23, 2024, Nearmap US, Inc. ("Nearmap") filed a petition for inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 10,671,648 ("the '648 Patent") ("IPR716"), assigned to Eagle View Technologies, Inc. ("Eagle View"). The '648 Patent relates to integrating information associated with particular geographic locations in a centralized database that may be queried for a time history of any of the locations. Nearmap asserted four grounds of unpatentability, consisting of an anticipation ground and three obviousness gounds. Each ground relied at least in part on U.S. Patent No. 9,501,507 to Harris et al. ("Harris").

In support of its unpatentability challenges, Nearmap constructed a single 64-page claim chart. The claim chart included a left column listing the specific claim language of each challenged claim, and a right column restating specific limitations from the claim language followed by parentheticals reciting portions of the asserted prior art that allegedly

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from