Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2026

Navigating USCIS’s New Green Card Discretion Rules

Davis, Malm & D'Agostine, P.C.
Explore more from Davis, Malm & D'Agostine, P.C.

Navigating the increasing changes to U.S. immigration policy and practices has become an exercise in agility for U.S. employers, particularly HR leaders responsible for overseeing U.S. work authorization...

United StatesImmigration
Allison Ahern Fillo
Allison Ahern Fillo
Author LinkedIn connections

A policy change targets temporary visa holders seeking permanent residency and could result in a gap in work. 

Navigating the increasing changes to U.S. immigration policy and practices has become an exercise in agility for U.S. employers, particularly HR leaders responsible for overseeing U.S. work authorization for foreign talent and coordinating global mobility. 

When U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) releases a major change in policy, U.S. employers should ask experienced immigration counsel the following three questions.

  1. Who does this impact? 
  2. How and when will the change be implemented? 
  3. How do organizations prepare for and mitigate potential gaps in U.S.-based work?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

October 2026 Visa Bulletin Advances EB-5 Filing Date For Mainland China By 4 Years

The U.S. Department of State has released the October 2026 Visa Bulletin, marking the start of fiscal year 2027 with significant changes to employment-based immigrant visa categories. How will the advancement of priority dates, particularly the substantial four-year leap for mainland China-born EB-5 investors in the Dates for Filing chart, impact eligible applicants seeking adjustment of status benefits?
GlobalImmigration
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

DHS Proposes $70,000 And $30,000 Fees For F-1 Optional Practical Training

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed a controversial new rule requiring SEVP-certified schools to pay substantial fees—$70,000 for a student's first Optional Practical Training recommendation and $30,000 for each subsequent OPT application, including STEM extensions. With only a 30-day comment period and potential annual costs reaching up to $16.5 billion across nearly 2,500 affected institutions, the proposed regulation is expected to face significant legal challenges if finalized.
United StatesImmigration
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

DHS Continues Work Authorization For Ukrainian, Sudanese TPS Beneficiaries; I-9 Guidance Remains Unclear

The Department of Homeland Security has not issued formal determinations for Temporary Protected Status designations for Ukraine and Sudan despite the October 19, 2026 expiration date, creating uncertainty for employers navigating Form I-9 compliance and employment authorization documentation. USCIS states that affected individuals retain TPS protections and work authorization, but has not updated operational guidance to explain how employers should document continued employment eligibility or handle
United StatesImmigration
Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Article

Massachusetts Zoning Disputes: Why The Path You Choose To Court Matters

A Massachusetts Appeals Court decision reveals how the procedural path chosen to challenge zoning restrictions can determine whether courts defer to municipal interpretations. The case examines whether seeking declaratory relief under G.L. c. 240, § 14A versus following traditional administrative appeals through the Zoning Board of Appeals affects judicial deference in disputed zoning interpretations.
United StatesReal Estate and Construction
Davis, Malm & D'Agostine, P.C.
Davis, Malm & D'Agostine, P.C.