Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 AUGUST 2026

Compliance Notes - Vol. 7, Issue 17

Trump v. California: On August 24, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court paused an injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and allowed the Trump administration to move forward with implementation of a March 2026 executive order affecting mail voting in 23 states and the District of Columbia.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

RECENT LOBBYING, ETHICS & CAMPAIGN FINANCE UPDATES


U.S. Supreme Court Election Law Developments

Trump v. California: On August 24, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court paused an injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and allowed the Trump administration to move forward with implementation of a March 2026 executive order affecting mail voting in 23 states and the District of Columbia. The order directs federal agencies to develop state citizenship lists, prioritize enforcement actions involving ballots issued to ineligible voters and establish new procedures related to mail-ballot administration. The Court did not decide whether the executive order is lawful, instead concluding that the states’ challenge was brought too early because the challenged directives had not yet caused a sufficiently concrete injury to support the lawsuit. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, with Jackson arguing that the decision

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from