Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 DECEMBER 2021

Insurance Coverage For Disgorgements—Considerations For Private Fund Managers

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

On November 23, 2021, the New York Court of Appeals held that an investment firm's $140 million disgorgement payment to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was not an excluded "penalty imposed by law"...

United StatesFinance and Banking

On November 23, 2021, the New York Court of Appeals held that an investment firm's $140 million disgorgement payment to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was not an excluded "penalty imposed by law" under the firm's insurance policies because it served compensatory purposes and represented an estimate of the firm's clients' wrongfully obtained profits (as distinct from a penalty payment that "was not derived from any estimate of harm or gain flowing from the improper trading practices"). The Court emphasized that its conclusion was specific to the insurance context and was based on New York principles of insurance policy interpretation, which require that exclusions be given a "strict and narrow construction."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from