Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2014

The Latest On Bonds And Guarantees

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

We last looked at bonds and guarantees in the 20th issue of Insight in February 2013 ,,

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

We last looked at bonds and guarantees in the 20th issue of Insight in February 2013 (http://www.fenwickelliott.com/files/insight_issue_20. pdf)

But three recent decisions in this area, Liberty Mercian Ltd v (1) Cuddy Civil Engineering Ltd (2) Cuddy Demolition and Dismantling Ltd EWHC 411 (TCC), Wuhan Gouyu Logistics Group C Ltd and another v Emporiki Bank of Greece SA [2013] EWCA Civ 1679 and Doosan Babcock Ltd v Comercializadora de Eqipos y Materiales Mabe Limitada [2013] EWHC 3010 (TCC), [2013] EWHC 3201 (TCC) warrant an update.

The first case, Cuddy, examines what happens in practice when a contractor fails to provide the bonds and warranties required of it by the contract. The second, Wuhan, considers the approach of the Court of Appeal to a bank which attempted to circumvent its obligation to make payment once the bond had been called. The third case, Doosan, provides a possible exception to the general rule that ondemand bonds are payable on demand (save

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from