Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 OCTOBER 2026

Coventry & Warwickshire Development Partnership LLP v Avison Young (UK) Ltd

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

An adjudicator awarded nearly £9 million in a construction dispute, but the losing party challenged the enforcement on grounds of inadequate reasoning and procedural unfairness. The court examined whether the adjudicator provided sufficient reasons for the decision and whether there was a breach of natural justice when considering third-party assessment documents without proper notice to the parties.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Avison resisted an application for summary enforcement of an adjudicator’s decision which awarded just under £9 million. Amongst the arguments put forward by Avison were that the adjudicator had failed to give adequate reasons for the decision and that, in a material breach of natural justice, the adjudicator had taken account of documents produced by Gardiner & Theobald (the “G&T Assessment”) without giving the parties an opportunity to address them.

Eyre J noted that a failure by an adjudicator to give adequate reasons for his or her decision can indicate that the adjudicator failed to decide the dispute which had been referred to them (and so had made a decision outside the adjudicator’s jurisdiction). It can also be an indication that the adjudicator failed to comply with the rules of natural justice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from