Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 AUGUST 2026

Netomnia Ltd v MJ Quinn Integrated Services Ltd

Fenwick Elliott LLP
Fenwick Elliott LLP
Contributor
Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott LLP

Fenwick Elliott provides a comprehensive range of legal services on every aspect of the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fenwick Elliott LLP

A dispute arose between Netomnia and MJQ over the validity of a payment application under their framework agreement for fibre-optic network construction. The central question was whether an application for payment that omitted key identifying information—specifically Polygon IDs and Feature IDs—could satisfy contractual requirements for verification, particularly in the context of a large-scale, multi-site infrastructure project with hundreds of work orders and thousands of features.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Netomnia was the operator of a fibre-optic network; MJQ was engaged in the construction and installation of the cabling and related infrastructure for Netomnia’s network. The parties entered into a framework agreement (the “MSA”) under which Netomnia was able to call off the services of MJQ to carry out works on the network.

The MSA provided for a system of interim payments. On 5 February 2026, MJQ sent an application for payment (the “AFP”) in the sum of £3,770.84. This was one of 168 applications for payment which were sent on that day in a similar format, in sums totalling just over £4.717 million. The AFP gave the reference of Work Order W0 0079, but it contained neither a purchase order number nor a relevant polygon identification number (Polygon ID) or relevant feature identification number (Feature ID). As a consequence, Netomnia said that the AFP was invalid.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from