Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 AUGUST 2023

Marks And Spencer Decision: Prioritising Retrofitting Over Redeveloping

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

On a called-in application, notwithstanding the Planning Inspectors positive recommendation, the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (SoS) has rejected planning permission...

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

Does the Marks and Spencer decision reveal the future of Government policy for demolition and redevelopment?

On a called-in application, notwithstanding the Planning Inspectors positive recommendation, the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities (SoS) has rejected planning permission for demolition and development of Marks and Spencer's flagship Oxford Street store. In rejecting the plans, the SoS focused on two main aspects - heritage and sustainability.

Heritage

A significant consideration in the SoS's refusal, and one to which he gave "very great weight", was the harm of the new building to the setting and significance of the designated heritage assets. In particular, the proposed development "would be prominent and distracting from the Selfridge's façade".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from