Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2007

Joint Names Insurance And Risk Allocation In Construction Projects

The employer entered into a JCT With Contractor’s Design (1998 ed) contract with the main contractor. Part of the work under the contract involved retaining a building's facades.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction
Jenny Savage
Jenny Savage
Will Sefton
Will Sefton

Two recent cases highlight how provision for joint names insurance in construction projects can determine risk allocation.

1. Hunt v ASME

The employer entered into a JCT With Contractor’s Design (1998 ed) contract with the main contractor. Part of the work under the contract involved retaining a building's facades. The main contractor contracted with the claimant (Hunt) as demolition sub-contractor who, in turn, contracted with the defendant (ASME) as a sub-subcontractor (to provide temporary supports to the facades during demolition). The facades were damaged in a fire caused by ASME's negligence.

Hunt settled a claim brought jointly by the employer and main contractor and then sought to recover the amount paid in settlement from ASME.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from