Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 NOVEMBER 2011

Greening v Castelnau Mansions

DMH Stallard LLP
DMH Stallard LLP
Contributor
DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard LLP

DMH Stallard delivers successful outcomes for businesses and individuals by providing tailored...

View firm profile
Explore more from DMH Stallard LLP

The recent case of Greening-v-Castelnau Mansions, decided by the Upper Tribunal, provides a timely reminder of the increasing difficulty landlords face in recovering legal costs and other professional fees in the absence of a clear covenant in the lease.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

The recent case of Greening-v-Castelnau Mansions, decided by the Upper Tribunal, provides a timely reminder of the increasing difficulty landlords face in recovering legal costs and other professional fees in the absence of a clear covenant in the lease.

Greening restates the principles laid down in Stella House-v- Mears [1989] and makes it clear that for a landlord to be confident that legal fees can be recovered the lease covenant needs to contemplate the recovery of legal costs with specific reference to legal fees, fees payable to solicitors or the cost of litigation or proceedings. A general covenant providing for recovery of professional fees will not always suffice.

Having said that, what is clear, is that each case must be decided on its own facts and the specific provisions of the lease. From a practical perspective, in cases where the provisions are ambiguous, or at least arguable, on the question of the recoverability of costs, most landlords will want

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from