Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 SEPTEMBER 2014

Dilapidations vs Improvements

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

25 year leases granted in the late 1980s followed by short term extensions (to delay relocations during the financial crisis) are coming to an end.

United KingdomReal Estate and Construction

An influx of lease expiries is on the horizon as 25 year leases granted in the late 1980s followed by short term extensions (to delay relocations during the financial crisis) come to an end. There will consequently be a spike in terminal dilapidations claims. Landlords may attempt to use terminal dilapidations claims to recover the cost of improving their properties to current standards but will they succeed?

The recent High Court decision in Sunlife Europe Properties Limited v Tiger Aspect Holdings Limited and Tiger Television Limited [2013] EWHC 463 (TCC) summarised the legal principles surrounding dilapidations claims involving improvements. These principles, set out below, appear to make it difficult for landlords to recover the cost of improvements as part of a dilapidations claim:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from