Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2011

Sex, Lies And Super-Injunctions

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

With reports that the identities of four celebrities who obtained gagging orders have been briefly revealed on Wikipedia, media lawyer Duncan Lamont reports on the rise of the super-injunction.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

With reports that the identities of four celebrities who obtained gagging orders have been briefly revealed on Wikipedia, media lawyer Duncan Lamont reports on the rise of the super-injunction.

Injunctions have evolved into super-injunctions to counter, in the eyes of celebrities, ever greater scrutiny of and intrusion into their private lives.

This is due in part to the rise of "citizen journalists" (more accurately, photo journalists) and the greater desire of certain individuals to brag about, and cash in on, their ability to have sexual relationships with celebrities.

Until the 1990s there was considerable criticism in the press of those who became famous solely for their sexual exploits with the famous. Now they are interviewed on breakfast television. Society, and the media, changed. The law has simply evolved to keep pace with the new reality.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from