Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 OCTOBER 2024

The Science Of Memory: Assessing Evidence In Complex Litigation

Enyo Law LLP
Enyo Law LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Enyo Law LLP

In Jaffé v Greybull Capital and others [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm), Cockerill J highlights the importance of understanding the dynamic nature of memory when assessing...

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Jaffé v Greybull Capital and others [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm), Cockerill J highlights the importance of understanding the dynamic nature of memory when assessing the reliability of witnesses' memories and near-contemporaneous documents.

Summary

In this case, Mrs Justice Cockerill was tasked with determining whether an alleged misrepresentation had been made orally nearly eight years ago in a meeting. In grappling with this question, Cockerill J provided a comprehensive analysis of the science of memory. She concluded that the dynamic nature of memory and the influence of time and context on recall should be taken into account when assessing the reliability of both oral and documentary evidence. She found that the near-contemporaneous note produced by one of the witnesses shortly after the meeting was inaccurate when tested against the facts in the full context.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from