Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 OCTOBER 2026

Protected Conversations: Why The Process Matters As Much As The Words Used

Irwin Mitchell
Irwin Mitchell
Contributor
Irwin Mitchell

Irwin Mitchell

Irwin Mitchell are legal experts that care. As one of the largest full-service law firms in the UK,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Irwin Mitchell

Discover how in-house legal teams are approaching litigation strategy in 2025, from viewing disputes as operational necessities to leveraging alternative funding and managing geopolitical risks. Our comprehensive survey of 81 businesses reveals the evolving priorities shaping legal decision-making across industries.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Many employers use section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to explore an agreed exit with an employee where there is no existing dispute.

The EAT's decision in Mr L Tarbuc v Martello Piling Limited(Opens in a new tab) reminds employers that protecting a conversation requires more than choosing the right words. Employers must handle the entire process carefully if they want the discussion to remain off the record in any subsequent ordinary unfair dismissal claim. 

What is section 111A?

Section 111A of the Employment Rights Act 1996(Opens in a new tab) allows employers to hold confidential discussions with an employee to agree the terms of an exit, even where no dispute exists. 

If those discussions do not result in an agreement, neither party can rely on them in any subsequent ordinary unfair dismissal claim, provided there has been no improper behaviour. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from