Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 AUGUST 2014

Getting It Wrong - Yet Another Arbitration Clause Fails The Test

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

Time and again the English court has been asked to interpret and enforce an arbitration clause in an agreement only to decide that clause is not valid.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Shareholders Agreements usually contain a dispute resolution clause, and particularly if the parties are from different countries that clause will often say that disputes under the Agreement are to be referred to arbitration. If an arbitration clause is not valid, under English law there will be no obligation to arbitrate because there is no valid agreement in writing to arbitrate as required by section 6(1) Arbitration Act 1996 ("the Act"). This means that a dispute between the parties needs to be resolved by litigation, often by the courts of a country which the parties had deliberately tried to avoid when they thought they had agreed in their contract to arbitrate somewhere else, usually somewhere neutral. There is also the added difficulty that, unlike arbitration Awards, the judgments of many courts are not recognised or enforced overseas in which case a successful claimant in court proceedings may never make any actual recoveries against the judgment debtor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from