Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2010

Stays of Execution: Two Options

Al Tamimi & Company
Al Tamimi & Company
Contributor
Al Tamimi & Company

Al Tamimi & Company

With a regional presence of 17 offices across 10 countries, Al Tamimi & Company stands as a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Al Tamimi & Company

In this case the Claimant sought, on two grounds, a stay of execution of a judgment. The Claimant’s first argument in support of the stay was that the case related to property ownership. The second argument was that the judgment was the subject of an appeal to the Court of Cassation.

United Arab EmiratesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Hassan Arab
Hassan Arab
Suzanne Abdallah
Suzanne Abdallah

Claim
In this case the Claimant sought, on two grounds, a stay of execution of a judgment. The Claimant's first argument in support of the stay was that the case related to property ownership. The second argument was that the judgment was the subject of an appeal to the Court of Cassation.

Facts of the case
A judgment was issued by the Court of First Instance in favour of the Defendant, which judgment cancelled a Sales & Purchase Contract entered into between the parties and compelled the Claimant to pay the Defendant the amount of AED 3,184,500 plus interest and legal fees. The Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision and the Defendant consequently filed a claim with the execution judge in order to enforce the judgment. The Claimant subsequently appealed to the Court of Cassation by filing an urgent request that the execution of the judgment be stayed based on article 175 of the UAE Civil Procedure Law (CPL).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from