Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2026

Forensic Reports Are Not Automatically Privileged, Says The SCA

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) in the case of Ibex RSA Holdco Ltd and Another v Tiso Blackstar Group (Pty) Ltd and Others 2025 (2) SA 408 (SCA) (“Ibex”)...

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of Appeal (“SCA”) in the case of Ibex RSA Holdco Ltd and Another v Tiso Blackstar Group (Pty) Ltd and Others 2025 (2) SA 408 (SCA) (“Ibex”), considered whether a private body could rely on legal privilege as a defence to deny access to a requested record, in terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000 (“PAIA”). This decision marks a pivotal moment in the evolution of corporate accountability in South Africa and clarifies the limits of legal privilege in the context of forensic investigations.

The case centred on the collapse of Steinhoff International Holdings NV (“Steinhoff”), which lost over R200 billion in shareholder value following the discovery of extensive accounting irregularities. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from