Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

134 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    How To Sue A Chinese Company

    Mainland Chinese courts do not enforce U.S. judgments, making litigation against Chinese companies complex. Understanding jurisdiction requirements, service of process protocols under the Hague Convention, discovery limitations, and the strategic advantages of arbitration versus court proceedings in China is essential for foreign companies seeking to recover damages or enforce contractual obligations against Chinese entities.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Harris Sliwoski
    Harris Sliwoski
  • Article

    律师费转移支付制度在境外的适用和例外

    律师费转移支付制度是指由败诉方承担胜诉方律师费用的制度。律师费承担的制度设计涉及到当事人的诉讼成本、司法资源的有效利用和公平
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    DeHeng Law Offices
    DeHeng Law Offices
Article

贪污贿赂犯罪自首认定规则的突破与调适——以《贪污贿赂司法解释(二)》为中心

自首作为我国刑法规定的法定从宽量刑情节,兼具激励行为人认罪悔罪、节约司法资源的双重价值。《刑法》第六十七条第二款规定了准自首制度——“被采取强制措施的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人和正在服刑的罪犯,如实供述司法机关还未掌握的本人其他罪行的,以自首论”。
ChinaCriminal Law
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    最高人民法院就《商标法时间效力》及《商标授权确权司法解释》稿公开征求意见

    China's Supreme People's Court has released two draft judicial interpretations for public consultation regarding the application of the newly amended Trademark Law, set to take effect January 1, 2027. These drafts address temporal application rules for trademark disputes and systematically adjust administrative litigation procedures for trademark authorization and invalidation cases, covering critical issues from bad faith registration to well-known trademark protection.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    信用证/备用信用证和独立保函开证银行 作为诉讼被告或第三人的上诉权研究

    在中国法院审理信用证或备用信用证或见索即付独立保函的民事程序中,当一审法院经过实体审理作出实体判决,判决开证行终止在用证或备用信用证或见索即付独立保函项下的付款义务时...
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    最高人民法院 "澳大利亚和新西兰银行集团有限公司马尼拉分行与中国电力工程有限公司、江苏银行股份有限公司等备用信用证纠纷案"民事申请再审审查裁定书(2024年10月24日)判决缩写和点评

    本案涉及一项跨境保备用信用证纠纷,其重大意义在于最高院在本案判决中明确了具有担保功能的备用信用证应当适用独立保函司法解释。
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    海关知识产权侵权调查中证据开示程序的挑战与应对

    2011年,南京海关在一起出口货物涉嫌商标侵权调查案件中,探索性的在全国海关系统率先引入了证据开示制度。在调查中,海关的办案人员引导双方当事人围绕案涉货物是否构成商标侵权,分别进行举证和质证。这是“证据开示制度”这个法律名词第一次出现在海关知识产权保护程序中。
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    技术类知识产权纠纷鉴定事项的要点梳理

    法院审查当事人司法鉴定申请时,通常关注当事人申请鉴定的事项是否与案件待查明事实具有关联关系、是否必须通过鉴定才能查明相应的专门性
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    中国法院永久终止独立保函付款的法律原则: 中国法和最高法院案例回顾(上篇)

    China's Supreme Court established strict conditions for permanently terminating payment under standby letters of credit and independent guarantees in its 2016 Judicial Interpretation.
    ChinaFinance and Banking
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    从“先刑后民”到“民刑并行”——《关于审理涉及刑事犯罪的民事纠纷案件若干问题的规定》重点条文解读

    最高人民法院发布《关于审理涉及刑事犯罪的民事纠纷案件若干问题的规定》,系统重构民刑交叉案件裁判规则,明确"民刑并行"原则,规范受理੧
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    民事抗诉再审案件司法实务观察报告——以近3年北京高院再审审查和审理民事抗诉案件为研究样本

    2026年3月最高检发布的民事检察工作白皮书显示,2025年全国检察机关受理生效裁判监督案件占比33%,监督意见采纳率达90.7%。本文通过对北京高院2024-2026年110件民事&
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    Judicial Assistance In Evidence Collection For Arbitration: Practical Breakthroughs Based On Authority From The Shanghai International Commercial Court

    In May 2025, the Shanghai International Commercial Court, for the first time, granted orders in support of evidence collection in international commercial arbitration through the issuance of an investigation order.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    因申请财产保全损害责任纠纷案件中的损失认定

    诉讼财产保全制度是民事诉讼中的重要制度安排,旨在保障未来生效判决的顺利执行。
    ChinaReal Estate and Construction
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    俄罗斯法院体系介绍

    而中俄两国在贸易往来的过程中,亦难免会产生摩擦。因此,对俄罗斯法院体系的通晓对中企在俄维护自身权益具有重要的意义。
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    DeHeng Law Offices
    DeHeng Law Offices
  • Showing 121–134 of 134 results

    Previous
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics