Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2013

Achieving The Balance Between Client Confidentiality And Compliance In Jersey

Baker & Partners LLP
Baker & Partners LLP
Contributor
Baker & Partners LLP

Baker & Partners LLP

The Cayman Islands office was opened in late 2020 with Robert Jones as the sole attorney. The...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker & Partners LLP

Jersey has never had, contrary to the belief held by some, banking secrecy enshrined in statute. It does have a statutory regime of data protection and client confidentiality is, of course, an important principle and fundamental to the relationship between banker and client.

JerseyFinance and Banking

Jersey has never had, contrary to the belief held by some, banking secrecy enshrined in statute. It does have a statutory regime of data protection and client confidentiality is, of course, an important principle and fundamental to the relationship between banker and client. The principle was recognised by the Court of Appeal (of England and Wales) in its landmark decision Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England [1924] 1 KB 461. That case recognised the duty of a banker, arising out of contract, not to disclose his clients' affairs. The duty applies to all information that the banker becomes privy to qua banker and survives the termination of the relationship of banker and client. The principles in that case have been adopted and developed by the Court in Jersey. Breach of that duty by the banker can lead to an action for damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from