Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2026

Non-Compete Fee Allowable As 'Business Expense'!!

AZB & Partners
AZB & Partners
Contributor
AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners

AZB & Partners, one of India’s premier law firms was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to...

View firm profile
Explore more from AZB & Partners

In a significant ruling impacting ongoing disputes, the Supreme Court[1] has held that non-compete fees paid to ward off competition are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the IT Act.

IndiaTax

In a significant ruling impacting ongoing disputes, the Supreme Court1 has held that non-compete fees paid to ward off competition are allowable as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the IT Act. The Apex Court held that, since such payment merely facilitates efficient conduct of business and does not result in creation of a capital asset or profit-earning apparatus, such payment could not partake the character of 'capital expenditure'.

Whilst holding so, the Supreme Court overturned the Delhi High Court's decision, which had treated a sum of INR 3 crore being paid as non-compete fee (for a seven year restriction) as capital in nature. The Delhi High Court held that the payment of non-compete fee secured an advantage of enduring nature, as it eliminated competition for a fixed period of seven years. Further, the Delhi High Court observed that such expenditure was not incurred merely to facilitate day-to-day business operations but to obtain a long-term

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from