Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 SEPTEMBER 2026

When CIRP Does Not Put Every Project Dispute On Hold

A common misconception holds that insolvency moratoriums protect everyone associated with a distressed company, but the Supreme Court's ruling in the Mantri Manyata Energia Project case clarifies that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code protects only the corporate debtor itself. What happens when promoters, directors, personal guarantors, and landowners face separate proceedings while the company undergoes Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and how do courts determine whose obligations

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

There’s a common misconception in company restructuring. It is that an insolvency moratorium protects everyone associated with a distressed company. In reality, the statutory protection applies to the corporate entity undergoing insolvency. Connected individuals and business partners may remain exposed to separate proceedings and personal liability.

Promoters, directors, personal guarantors, project entities and landowners may all face separate exposure when a real estate developer or project company enters the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Homebuyers and consumers may name both the company and its directors, promoters or land partners in the same claim. The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Mantri Manyata Energia Project case, reinforces that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) protects the corporate debtor and its assets, rather than every party connected with it. It does not extend the same protection to non-debtor individuals, so proceedings

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from