Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2023

No Escaping From Penal Liability By Citing Company's Dissolution

On April 19, 2016, the Respondent issued a legal notice under Section 138 of the NI Act calling upon the Accused Company and the Appellant.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

On March 15, 2023, a three judge bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka vs Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited1 and other connected matters held that personal liability of a signatory/director of a company in a cheque dishonour case filed under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ("NI Act") cannot be absolved pending corporate insolvency resolution proceedings ("CIRP") against the company under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC").

Facts

In this case, one M/s Rainbow Papers Limited (Accused Company) of which the Appellant herein was the Promoter and Managing Director, sought a term loan of Rs. 30 crores from a public financial institution (Respondent herein). In order to satisfy its obligations under the Loan Agreement dated March 27, 2012, the Accused Company issued a post-dated cheque towards payment of one of the instalments, but the cheque was returned for the reason "Account Closed",

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from