Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2026

NCLAT’s Judgment Rejecting Vedanta’s Appeal In Jaypee’s CIRP

Argus Partners
Argus Partners
Contributor
Argus Partners

Argus Partners

Argus Partners is a leading Indian law firm with offices in Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Kolkata....

View firm profile
Explore more from Argus Partners

Argus Partners provides essential information about their office locations and legal practice guidelines. The firm outlines the regulatory framework governing legal advertising in India and establishes clear terms for website visitors regarding the nature of information provided and the absence of any attorney-client relationship through digital engagement.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In a recent judgment in Vedanta Limited v. Bhuvan Madan, Resolution Professional of Jaiprakash Associates Limited [Company Appeal (AT) Insolvency Nos. 552 & 553 of 2026], the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (“NCLAT”), considered the extent to which the commercial wisdom of the committee of creditors (“CoC”) may be questioned where the approved resolution plan is alleged to offer lower value than a competing plan.

The appeal arose from the approval of the resolution plan submitted by Adani Enterprises Limited (“Adani”) in the corporate insolvency resolution process (“CIRP”) of Jaiprakash Associates Limited (“JAL”) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”), in preference to the plan submitted by Vedanta Limited (“Vedanta”), which claimed to have offered higher gross value and higher net present value (“NPV”).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from