Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2018

Moratorium Under IBC Not Applicable On Section 138 Of NI Act

The current case in question revolves around two complaints filed by the Appellants under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 one prior to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process...

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

IN THE MATTER OF

Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd v. P. Mohanraj & Ors.- NCLAT

New Delhi Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 306 of 2018

FACTS

The current case in question revolves around two complaints filed by the Appellants under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 one prior to the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and the other thereafter.

It was the contention of the Respondent – Directors, that during the period of Moratorium proceeding, petition under Section 138 of NI Act was not maintainable

NCLAT Held

The bench observed that –

"We do not agree with such submission as Section 138 is a penal provision, which empowers the court of competent jurisdiction to pass order of imprisonment or fine, which cannot be held to be proceeding or any judgment or decree of money claim. Imposition of fine cannot be held to be a money claim or recovery against the Corporate Debtor nor order of imprisonment, if passed by the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from