Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JUNE 2025

Insolvency Law

JSA Advocates & Solicitors
JSA Advocates & Solicitors
Contributor
JSA Advocates & Solicitors

JSA Advocates & Solicitors

Established in 1991 Our services: JSA is a leading law firm in India with more than 600...

View firm profile
Explore more from JSA Advocates & Solicitors

On April 2, 2025, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ("Madras HC"), in M/s. Empee Distilleries Limited vs. The Superintending Engineer and Ors.1, delivered a pivotal ruling on the interplay between the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") and statutory claims under litigation.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Known statutory claims survive Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 resolution plan, if not disclosed

On April 2, 2025, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ("Madras HC"), in M/s. Empee Distilleries Limited vs. The Superintending Engineer and Ors.1, delivered a pivotal ruling on the interplay between the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") and statutory claims under litigation. The Madras HC held that a claim pending before a statutory appellate body is not extinguished upon approval of a resolution plan by the National Company Law Tribunal ("NCLT") if it was known but not disclosed during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process ("CIRP"). This decision underscores the duty of the Interim Resolution Professional ("IRP") and promoters to ensure full transparency regarding known debts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from