Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2025

Cayman Short Form Merger – Is It A Loophole?

Appleby
Appleby
Contributor
Appleby

Appleby

Appleby is a leading offshore law firm. The team of legal specialists advise global public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Appleby

Section 238 of the Companies Act (2025 Revision) (the "Act") provides a statutory right for shareholders who dissent from a merger to be paid a judicially determined fair value for their shares in lieu...

GlobalCorporate/Commercial Law

Section 238 of the Companies Act (2025 Revision) (the "Act") provides a statutory right for shareholders who dissent from a merger to be paid a judicially determined fair value for their shares in lieu of the merger consideration being offered by the merging company.

In recent years, number of cases under section 238 of the Act have grown substantially as there are an increasing number of take-private transactions involving US listed Chinese companies.

The statutory merger process pursuant to part 16 of the Companies Act must be authorised by a special resolution of the Company's members, which requires the consent of a two-thirds majority of the shareholders (referred to as a "long-form merger"). A member who wishes to dissent from a long-form merger must file a notice of objection in writing prior to the vote in the extraordinary general meeting ("EGM"), and a formal notice of dissent after the company gives notice that the merger was authorised at the EGM.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from