Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2025

LD Munich, March 17, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_815/2024

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

With a previous order dated 23 January 2025 (ORD_3866/2025), the Court referred to a previous order from the Central Division Paris in UPC_CFI_367/2023 to indicate...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

A decision for an implied R. 262.2 RoP application is normally only warranted where a third party makes an application under R. 262.3 RoP, but there may be exceptions to allow the case to proceed

With a previous order dated 23 January 2025 (ORD_3866/2025), the Court referred to a previous order from the Central Division Paris in UPC_CFI_367/2023 to indicate that Meril would have unlimited access to the costs application, while restrictions on confidential information would apply to third parties and the public.

With brief dated 3 February 2025, Edwards modified its request to restrict access to the Confidential Information to Meril and their representatives.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from