Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2026

LD Düsseldorf, September 2, 2026, Decision, UPC_CFI_297/2025, UPC_CFI_651/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The Düsseldorf Local Division partially upheld a patent relating to multimedia content sharing in peer-to-peer configurations and found indirect infringement by Disney's streaming service. The decision addresses critical issues of claim construction, patent validity, and procedural aspects while applying established UPC case law on inventive step testing.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

The Düsseldorf Local Division partially upheld the patent-in-suit, which relates to “SHARING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT IN A PEER-TO-PEER CONFIGURATION”, and found that the patent in its upheld version was indirectly infringed by the Disney+ streaming service. The decision focusses on claim construction, validity and some procedural aspects, applying the UPC’s established case law, for example regarding the inventive step test introduced in Meril v Edwards and Amgen v Sanofi.

Auxiliary requests are to be reviewed in the order secified by the Claimant, and dependent claims can be defended even without filing an auxiliary request under Rule 30 RoP (Application to amend the patent); cf. UPC_CoA_473/2025.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from