Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2026

LD Munich, August 6, 2026, Cost Decision, UPC_CFI_1569/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

A cost determination proceeding at the Unified Patent Court's Local Division Munich involves Niche Biomedical, Inc. (ANEUVO) as applicant and ONWARD Medical N.V. as respondent, concerning European Patent EP 3 421 081 B1. The case addresses the application of Rules 152.2 and 156.1 of the Rules of Procedure, Article 76 of the UPC Agreement, and the Administrative Committee's decision on recoverable costs ceilings.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1 Key takeaways

A request to raise or lower the ceiling for recoverable costs must be clear and explicit.

A request to adjust the cost ceiling (Article 2(4) of the Decision of the Administrative Committee of 24 April 2023 on the scale of recoverable costs ceilings) is only deemed to have been made if it is clear and explicit from the request that a raising or a reduction of the ceiling is sought. This is based on the principles of Article 76 UPCA. The Court held that requiring an explicit request is a significant procedural principle, not a mere formality.

A request for an interim award of costs up to a specified amount does not constitute a request to raise or lower the ceiling for recoverable costs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from