Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2025

LD Munich, August 26, 2025, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_248-2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The court may, pursuant to Art. 64(4) UPCA and R.158.1 RoP, at its own discretion and upon the defendant's application, order the provision of security for the costs of the proceedings...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Security for costs

The court may, pursuant to Art. 64(4) UPCA and R.158.1 RoP, at its own discretion and upon the defendant's application, order the provision of security for the costs of the proceedings and any other costs of the party, taking into account the facts and arguments presented by the parties. In doing so, the court has to examine whether the claimant's financial situation gives rise to legitimate and actual concerns that a possible costs order might not be enforceable, and/or that any costs order issued by the court might be enforceable only with disproportionate difficulty. The court has assumed such disproportionate enforcement difficulty in view of the claimant's registered office in the People's Republic of China. While Union law guarantees the recognition and enforcement of judgments of courts of Member States in other Member States, the court is of the opinion that there may be no comparable guarantees for the recognition and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from