1. Key takeaways
No equivalent infringement without essentially the same
effect
According to all doctrines of equivalence or equivalence tests
of the UPC contracting member states, equivalent patent
infringement is ruled out if there is no technical-functional
equivalence of the substitute means in the sense that the modified
means do not perform essentially the same function in order to
achieve essentially the same effect. Insofar as the same function
is not taken as a reference, at least essentially the same effect
is taken as a reference (following the Local Division Brussels,
Beslissing ten gronde of January 17, 2025, mn. 98).
No isolated revocation of dependent
sub-claims