Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2025

LD Mannheim, June 27, 2025, Request For Time Extension, UPC_CFI_344/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The Court aligned time limits for statements of defense for defendants represented by the same counsel and with close corporate ties to avoid procedural complications and promote efficiency.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1 Key takeaways

Harmonization of time limits is justified for efficient case management in multi-defendant cases

The Court aligned time limits for statements of defense for defendants represented by the same counsel and with close corporate ties to avoid procedural complications and promote efficiency.

Harmonized time limit for statements of defense also applies to any counterclaim for revocation

The time limit for statements of defense automatically extends to filing any counterclaim for revocation by the defendants.

Request for time extension requires concrete justification, not just general claims of complexity

The Court rejected the request for a longer extension beyond harmonization, finding the defendants' arguments are too vague and lack specific factual support.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from