Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2024

LD Mannheim, June 27, 2024, Indicative Decision, UPC_CFI_ 210/2023

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

According to R. 13(1)(n) RoP in cases of technically complex subject-matters, the Statement of Claim must already contain the claim construction...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Arguments on claim construction to be made with the Statement of Claim

According to R. 13(1)(n) RoP in cases of technically complex subject-matters, the Statement of Claim must already contain the claim construction if the patent in suit is not readily understandable on its own. In case the plaintiff does not comply, further legal issues may arise (Additional round of submissions needed? Decision by default according to R. 355 RoP?) which, however, are not yet decided in the present order.

In the Reply to a counterclaim for revocation, the patent proprietor has to structure its argumentation according to the specific features of the patent claim.

Late-filing of the application to amend the patent

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from