1. Key takeaways
Admissibility of late submissions deferred post-hearing;
panel to decide
The decision on rejecting the claimant's allegedly late
FRAND submissions, and final admission of the defendant's
reply, is deferred to the panel after the oral hearing.
No extension of written procedure; narrow provisional
reply allowed (Rule 36 RoP)
The court closed the written phase and refused an extension; the
defendant may file a narrowly scoped, provisional reply on the
specific FRAND point. Case management supports avoiding delay (Art.
43 UPCA).
Tailored confidentiality regime for third‑party
licence (Rule 262A RoP; Rules 290.2, 291 RoP)
- Confidentiality applies to the licence and derived non-public
information; access limited to registered UPC representatives (and
their assistants), three client employees, and an external economic
expert team.