Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2026

LD Mannheim, January 13, 2026, Order, UPC_CFI_850/2026

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The decision on rejecting the claimant's allegedly late FRAND submissions, and final admission of the defendant's reply, is deferred to the panel after the oral hearing.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Admissibility of late submissions deferred post-hearing; panel to decide

The decision on rejecting the claimant's allegedly late FRAND submissions, and final admission of the defendant's reply, is deferred to the panel after the oral hearing.

No extension of written procedure; narrow provisional reply allowed (Rule 36 RoP)

The court closed the written phase and refused an extension; the defendant may file a narrowly scoped, provisional reply on the specific FRAND point. Case management supports avoiding delay (Art. 43 UPCA).

Tailored confidentiality regime for third‑party licence (Rule 262A RoP; Rules 290.2, 291 RoP)

  • Confidentiality applies to the licence and derived non-public information; access limited to registered UPC representatives (and their assistants), three client employees, and an external economic expert team.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from