Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2024

LD Dusseldorf, October 31, 2024, Order On Provisional Measures, UPC_CFI_368/024

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The urgency period is to be measured from the date on which the applicant is or should have been aware of the infringement.

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

No uniform urgency period.

The urgency period is to be measured from the date on which the applicant is or should have been aware of the infringement. Whether a delay is unreasonable depends on the circumstances of the individual case. There is no fixed deadline by which the applicant must submit its application for provisional measures. The question is always whether the applicant's con-duct as a whole justifies the conclusion that the enforcement of its rights is not urgent.

Tailoring of injunction in view of potential considerable damage for a customer and ultimately the defendants through recourse claims.

The Court ordered a preliminary injunction but, subject to a security payment, limited it with regard to supplies within the framework and the scope of the existing delivery obligations for the manufacturing of specific product lines of a particular customer of the defendants.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from