Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2025

LD Düsseldorf, September 3, 2025, Order, UPC_CFI_449/2025

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The application for a default decision merely supplements, but does not replace, the main application for a PI and other provisional measures...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

The application for a default decision merely supplements, but does not replace, the main application for a PI and other provisional measures

Under R. 209.1(a) RoP, the Court notifies the defendant of an application for provisional measures and invite objections. If the defendant does not respond or declines to substantiate objections, the Court may decide the matter based solely on the applicant's submissions by issuing a regular PI order.

A decision by default under R. 355.1(a) RoP is not applicable in this context, since (i) the Rules on provisional measures (R. 205 et seq. RoP) do not provide for it, and (ii) only a regular PI order reflects the balance of interests: the defendant chooses whether to object, and declining does not entitle them to the procedural benefits of a default decision (such as the possibility of setting it aside).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from