Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2024

LD Düsseldorf, November 29, 2024, Request For Simultaneous Interpretation, UPC_CFI_355/2023

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

The UPC retains discretion in granting simultaneous interpretation, even when a party requests it. Rules 109.1 and 109.2(1) RoP highlight the Judge-Rapporteur's authority...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Discretionary interpretation

The UPC retains discretion in granting simultaneous interpretation, even when a party requests it. Rules 109.1 and 109.2(1) RoP highlight the Judge-Rapporteur's authority to decide whether and to what extent simultaneous interpretation is appropriate. If the Judge-Rapporteur refuses the request for simultaneous interpretation, a party may, at its own expense, engage a simultaneous interpreter and request that arrangements for simultaneous interpretation be made, as far as is practically possible, at its own expense (Rule 109.2 (2) RoP).

Cost allocation

The UPC may decide whether to include interpretation costs in the proceedings' overall costs. The court will consider factors like the chosen language's official status within the UPC framework and the requesting party's actual need for interpretation. The UPC cannot generally be expected to provide interpretation into all languages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from