Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2026

LD Düsseldorf, April 16, 2026, Decision, UPC_CFI_779/2024

Bardehle Pagenberg
Bardehle Pagenberg
Contributor
Bardehle Pagenberg

Bardehle Pagenberg

IP practitioners with technical expertise As one of Europe’s leading IP law firms, BARDEHLE...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bardehle Pagenberg

Where a patent claim protects a two-component product, the objective elements of indirect infringement are satisfied if the accused component is designed to cooperate with a second component...

GermanyIntellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

For the objective elements of indirect infringement, it is not necessary that both components of the patent claim do exist (Art. 26 UPCA).

Where a patent claim protects a two-component product, the objective elements of indirect infringement are satisfied if the accused component is designed to cooperate with a second component configured in accordance with the invention. Whether such a second component actually exists, only becomes relevant at the level of the subjective requirements for indirect infringement.

All features mentioned in a patent claim generally are essential elements of the invention in the context of indirect infringement under Art. 26 UPCA.

It is irrelevant whether the features appear in the preamble or the characterizing portion, or whether they distinguish the invention from the prior art.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from