Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2018

Changes In Enforcement Of Arbitral Award. Why Western Companies Should Pay Attention

ALTENBURGER LTD legal + tax
ALTENBURGER LTD legal + tax
Contributor
ALTENBURGER LTD legal + tax

ALTENBURGER LTD legal + tax

Altenburger Ltd legal + tax is a Swiss law firm with offices located in Zurich, Geneva and Lugano....

View firm profile
Explore more from ALTENBURGER LTD legal + tax

In its original form, the Prior Reporting System, designed in 1994 and 1995, established a duty for lower courts to report and request approval from the higher courts (all the way up to the SPC) if the former intend to annul ...

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Prior Reporting System – The Current Framework

In its original form, the Prior Reporting System, designed in 1994 and 1995, established a duty for lower courts to report and request approval from the higher courts (all the way up to the SPC) if the former intend to annul or refuse enforcement of a foreign-related or foreign award.

The original purpose of the Prior Reporting System was to ensure consistency and a minimum quality for the judicial review of foreign-related arbitration cases. The Prior Reporting System is believed to have contributed to the substantial reduction of local protectionism and to a more pro-arbitration environment in the Chinese court system. Yet this improvement came with a price: Given the lack of specific time limits imposed on the courts as well as the lack of sanctions for undue delay, the Prior Reporting System has led to substantial delays in the process for enforcing arbitral awards.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from