Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 AUGUST 2020

商评委在商标授权确权行政应诉案件中主要败诉原因分析及启示--以情势变更、采信新证据为研究视角

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
Contributor
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office is the oldest and one of the largest full-service...

View firm profile
Explore more from CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

近年来，随着中国商标申请量的急剧上升，各类商标评审案件乃至后续的行政诉讼案件数量也显著增多，其中涉及不少商标审查及司法实务的

ChinaIntellectual Property
Gang Hu
Gang Hu
Mengran Gan
Mengran Gan
Author LinkedIn connections

近年来，随着中国商标申请量的急剧上升，各类商标评审案件乃至后续的行政诉讼案件数量也显著增多，其中涉及不少商标审查及司法实务的热点、难点问题。商评委自2007年开始，每年都会在其官方网站上公开发布《法务通讯》，对上一年度商标评审案件行政应诉的总体情况以及各种主要败诉原因进行高度概括性的介绍。其中，"情势变更"、"采信新证据"导致的败诉率一直居高不下，已然成为主要的败诉原因。 将从2015年至2017年这三年发布的《法务通讯》相关内容进行归纳和梳理，尤其是将"情势变更"、"采信新证据"这两大商评委主要败诉原因与最新相关司法案例结合起来，具体分析如下。

1. 2015-2017年，商评委案件裁决总量、应诉量（率）、败诉量（率）概要1

表1：2015-2017年，一审、二审判决总量

年度 一审、二审判决总量（万件）
2015 10.89
2016 12.52
2017 16.89

表2：商评委案件一审、二审应诉率（注：应诉率实际反映的是评审裁定案件的一审起诉率

年度 应诉量（万件） 应诉率
2015 0.76 7% 2
2016 0.53 4.27%
2017 0.93 5.5%

表3：商评委案件在一审、二审法院的败诉率

年度 一审判决
判决总量（件） 败诉量（件） 败诉率
2015 6618 1216 18.6%
2016

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

China's Supreme Court Issues Landmark Judicial Rules On AI: Implications For Product Liability, IP, Data, And Generative AI

China's Supreme People's Court has issued comprehensive judicial rules addressing artificial intelligence disputes, establishing frameworks for product liability, intellectual property rights, and data protection. These landmark opinions provide critical guidance for global companies navigating AI-related legal risks in China's evolving regulatory landscape.
ChinaIntellectual Property
Jones Day
Jones Day
Article

浅谈《专利审查指南》中关于“同日双申”的处理方式的修改

China's National Intellectual Property Office has issued Order No. 84, fundamentally altering the "same-day dual application" strategy where applicants could file both utility model and invention patents for identical innovations. Starting January 1, 2026, applicants must abandon their utility model patent rights to obtain invention patent authorization, eliminating the previous option to modify claims and maintain both protections simultaneously.
ChinaIntellectual Property
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office