Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2016

Shimano Inc. v. PRB, Return Of The New Matter Issue To Its Regular Understanding?

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
Contributor
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office is the oldest and one of the largest full-service...

View firm profile
Explore more from CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

On December 27, 2013, the Supreme People's Court of China made its Judgment on Shimano Inc. v. Patent Reexamination Board.

ChinaIntellectual Property

I. Brief of Shimano Inc. v. PRB

On December 27, 2013, the Supreme People's Court of China made its Judgment on Shimano Inc. v. Patent Reexamination Board (i.e. PRB). See Supreme People's Court (2013) Administrative Certiorari Case No. 21. In the Judgment, the court upheld the Invalidation Decision No. 15307 of the PRB, which announced invalid Chinese invention patent No. 02127848.2, titled Rear Derailleur, of which Shimano Inc. is the patent owner.

This case may trace back to the invalidation requests against the above Chinese invention patent filed by Ningbo Saiguan Bicycle Co., Ltd. The PRB made said Invalidation Decision announcing all of claims 1-6 invalid as two amendments made to the claims during the prosecution of the patent go beyond the disclosure of the initial description and claims, i.e. the initial disclosure of the parent application No. 94102612.4. Shimano appealed the Invalidation Decision. Since both the first instance court and the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from