Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2013

OMB Confirms Section 37 Contributions Must Be Specific, Fair, Transparent And Predictable

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

As municipalities desperately look for new sources of revenue, section 37 of the Planning Act has received more attention.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

As municipalities desperately look for new sources of revenue, section 37 of the Planning Act has received more attention. That section provides that in exchange for facilities or services (such as public art or community benefits), municipalities may allow developments to exceed the maximum height and density standards permitted by the applicable zoning bylaw. To exercise this authority, the municipality's official plan must include provisions which permit height and density increases.

In the recent decision of 1477677 Ontario Ltd. (Baywood Homes) v. Toronto (City), the Ontario Municipal Board (the "Board") refused to impose a section 37 contribution in the amount of $260,000 in exchange for a development of approximately 3,858 square meters over and above the as-of-right zoning permissions. In doing so, the Board confirmed that section 37 benefits must be grounded in fair, clear, transparent, predictable and specific requirements that are set out in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from