As the saying goes, there are only two certainties in
life—death and taxes. Unless, as in the case of Miculinic Investment Corp. v. 2303515 Ontario
Inc., et al., you're dealing with the
amount of tax owing on a purchase of mixed-use property without a
clear purchase price allocation between the residential and
commercial portions. In this case, there most definitely was
uncertainty.
Background and Transaction Overview
On August 4, 2021, Miculinic Investment Corp. (the Vendor)
entered into an agreement of purchase and sale (the APS) with
2303515 Ontario Inc. and 1000029174 Ontario Inc. (the Purchaser),
to sell a mixed residential and commercial use property for
C$11,500,000. The APS contained a standard form fill in the blank
provision that stated that harmonized sales tax (HST) was
"included in" the purchase price. The APS did not set out
the amount of HST owing, or what portion of the property was
residential versus commercial (which, in this case, had an