Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MARCH 2014

Trade-mark Confusion: Is One Letter Enough Of A Difference?

These two marks were assessed in the recent case of 7-Eleven, Inc v BitBite Foods Inc. , 2014 TMOB 16 (CanLII), for snack food products.

CanadaIntellectual Property

BIG BITE vs. BIT BITE.

These two marks were assessed in the recent case of 7-Eleven, Inc v BitBite Foods Inc. , 2014 TMOB 16 (CanLII), for snack food products. BitBite Foods filed an application to register the BIT BITE design at right in connection with a variety of food products. 7-11 opposed the application on the basis of their family of BIG BITE marks, including BIG BITE (TMA728,674), 1/3 LB. BIGGEST BIG BITE (TMA593,755), SMOKIE BIG BITE (TMA393,436), and SUPER BIG BITS (TMA602,497), also in association with food products. The 7-11 marks included the BIG BITE Design (TMA405,449) at left.

Essentially, both marks were associated with food products, both marks featured a stylized "bite" design element, and the marks were virtually identical except for a single letter. 7-11 argued that their marks were all registered and had been used in Canada since the 1990s. The BIT BITE mark by comparison was applied for on the basis of "proposed use" meaning

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from