Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 MAY 2025

Charter Of The French Language – Quebec Update: Are You Ready For The Changes?

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

Are you ready for changes to the Charter of the French Language ("Charter") that will come into force on June 1, 2025? Bill 96 was enacted on June 1, 2022, with its various provisions taking effect...

CanadaIntellectual Property
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

MEMORANDUM

Date: May 16, 2025

Re: Charter of the French Language – Quebec update: Are you ready for the changes?

Are you ready for changes to the Charter of the French Language ("Charter") that will come into force on June 1, 2025? Bill 96 was enacted on June 1, 2022, with its various provisions taking effect over a three-year period. The Charter applies not only to Quebec-based companies, but also to Quebec subsidiaries and divisions of companies based elsewhere. Franchise operations in Quebec are also subject to Charter requirements, as are all products and services sold or offered in Quebec. In addition to Charter changes under Bill 96 that are already in effect, the following are important to note for the June 1 deadline:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

When AI Meets Copyright: SOCAN v Suno And The Broader AI Copyright Landscape

The Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada has launched a landmark Federal Court claim against AI music platform Suno, alleging systematic copyright infringement on a massive scale. As Canadian courts prepare to address whether AI platforms can infringe existing copyrights and whether AI-generated works merit protection, these cases will establish critical precedents for how generative AI intersects with intellectual property law across all industries.
CanadaIntellectual Property
McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Article

Honest Belief No Defence To Defamatory Tweet About MP (Maggi v. Smith)

A recent Ontario court decision examines whether sincere belief in serious allegations can protect speakers from defamation liability when making accusations about public figures on social media. The case arose from posts alleging that a lawyer and Member of Parliament intimidated voters during a political nomination contest, raising important questions about the balance between free expression and reputation protection in political discourse.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Plaintiffs Awarded A Total Of $800,000 In Damages For Defamation (Murdy v. Barrette)

A Canadian court awarded $800,000 in damages to a couple defamed by serious false allegations of sexual assault and criminal misconduct spread through social media. The case examines how factors like the severity of accusations, use of social media platforms, and a defendant's failure to mount a defense can dramatically escalate defamation damages beyond typical awards.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

No Charter Right To Bicycle Lanes (Cycle Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General))

The Ontario Court of Appeal has overturned a lower court ruling that found the provincial government's legislation to remove bicycle lanes from major Toronto streets unconstitutional. The decision addresses fundamental questions about the separation of powers between courts and legislatures, and whether the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms creates positive obligations for governments to maintain infrastructure like bicycle lanes.
CanadaGovernment, Public Sector
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Lights, Camera Infractions: A Review Of Ontario’s Automatic Enforcement System Offence Regime, The Risks To Commercial Vehicle Carriers And How Operators Can Protect Themselves

Ontario's automatic enforcement system (AES) offences, captured by red light cameras and similar technology, pose significant regulatory risks to commercial vehicle carriers. These offences carry the maximum 5 CVOR penalty points—equivalent to impaired driving or criminal negligence—yet are nearly impossible to defend or resolve through plea negotiations.
CanadaTransport
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Lawyer Receives 6-Month Suspension For Misuse Of Artificial Intelligence (Law Society Of Ontario v. Lee)

The misuse of artificial intelligence by litigants and lawyers continues to be alarming. Although it is well-documented that generative artificial intelligence platforms have a tendency to produce inaccurate answers to legal questions, and, moreover, to produce output which references non-existing cases or which inaccurately portrays legal propositions in existing cases, these tools continue to be used recklessly.
CanadaCriminal Law
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP