Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2017

Self-Incrimination And Settlement Agreements

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Misconduct in the securities industry can give rise to both criminal and regulatory liability. One problem that arises from this overlap is the potential for state-compelled self-incrimination.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Misconduct in the securities industry can give rise to both criminal and regulatory liability. One problem that arises from this overlap is the potential for state-compelled self-incrimination. In the criminal context, an accused person is not a compellable witness. In the securities context, the situation is the opposite. An investigated person can be compelled to give incriminating evidence against themselves. Such testimony is generally protected from use in any subsequent criminal proceedings by the operation the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

One area of continued controversy is the impact of entering into a settlement agreement with a securities regulator. Does an investigated member who settles give up their right to protection against self-incrimination?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from