Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2016

Changes In Arbitration Law In Consumers Relations

All in all, it is clear that the purpose of the Bill N. 406/2013 is to expand the application of arbitration in Brazil, so as to reduce the amount of lawsuits in the Judicial Branch...

BrazilLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Caterina Luca
Caterina Luca

On 10/02/2013 Senator Renan Calheiros submitted the Bill N. 406/2013 to the Federal Senate. Said bill proposes, among other things, to include § 3º of Article 4º of Law N. 9.307/96 in order to allow the usage of arbitration in consumer-related conflicts.

The aforementioned paragraph sets forth that, in consumer relations established by means of an adhesion contract, the clause would only be effective if the adhering party initiates the arbitration process or expressly agrees to its usage. Therefore, this would allow the parties to enjoy more freedom, as they would be able to include a binding clause in contracts that regulate consumer relations.

Thus, the practice of arbitration would be made possible without conflicting with the limitations set forth in Article 51, VII, of the Código de Defesa do Consumidor (Brazilian Consumer Defense Code), which nullifies any clause that forces the consumer to the arbitration courts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from