Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2026

Using AI In PIC Proceedings? Disclosure And Verification Are Essential

The Personal Injury Commission of New South Wales has issued its first decision addressing the use of generative AI in legal proceedings, establishing clear expectations for disclosure and verification when AI tools are employed. In Sentinel Community Services Pty Ltd v Clark Chesaites, an employer's undisclosed use of AI resulted in incorrect case citations and irrelevant statutory references, prompting the Commission to emphasize that compliance with AI disclosure rules applies equally to self-represented

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kate Ralph
Kate Ralph
Jessica Maiuolo
Jessica Maiuolo
Author LinkedIn connections

As the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become more widespread, the legal industry is grappling with what place it has in court proceedings. The Personal Injury Commission Rules 2021 (PIC Rules)and Procedural Direction PIC13 – Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, deals with the use of generative AI in the Personal Injury Commission.

The Rules and Procedural Direction provide, among other things that, if AI has been used in the preparation of written submissions or arguments, the author must verify in the body of the submissions that all citations, legal and academic authority, case law and legislative references, exist, are accurate, and are relevant to the proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from